<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: osCommerce announces the final beta for V3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ozeworks.com/2009/03/oscommerce-announces-the-final-beta-for-v30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ozeworks.com/2009/03/oscommerce-announces-the-final-beta-for-v30/</link>
	<description>We don&#039;t just build websites, we build businesses ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozEworks</title>
		<link>http://www.ozeworks.com/2009/03/oscommerce-announces-the-final-beta-for-v30/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>ozEworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozeworks.com/?p=81#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Personally I would not. The reasons are several:

1. Although it has been heavily tested within development environments, it has not been widely tested in real live situations.  So unless you like being the first cab off the rank, let some other sites do the final debugging for you. 

2. So far there are not a lot of Add Ons for V3.0 so you might be looking at heavy coding costs if you want extras.

3. V3 is a technology upgrade not functionality upgrade per se.  You are not gaining a lot from using V3 versus RC2a.  

So we say go with RC2a.  

And if you are not in a hurry and can wait a couple of weeks, we&#039;ll be releasing ozEcommerce Base which is RC2a loaded for free download from ozEcommerce.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would not. The reasons are several:</p>
<p>1. Although it has been heavily tested within development environments, it has not been widely tested in real live situations.  So unless you like being the first cab off the rank, let some other sites do the final debugging for you. </p>
<p>2. So far there are not a lot of Add Ons for V3.0 so you might be looking at heavy coding costs if you want extras.</p>
<p>3. V3 is a technology upgrade not functionality upgrade per se.  You are not gaining a lot from using V3 versus RC2a.  </p>
<p>So we say go with RC2a.  </p>
<p>And if you are not in a hurry and can wait a couple of weeks, we&#8217;ll be releasing ozEcommerce Base which is RC2a loaded for free download from ozEcommerce.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ozeworks.com/2009/03/oscommerce-announces-the-final-beta-for-v30/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozeworks.com/?p=81#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I wanted to get an osCommerce site.  Should I wait for V3.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to get an osCommerce site.  Should I wait for V3.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

